Lava Blaze Dragon alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Blaze Dragon
Lava Blaze Dragon
-
Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@60fps
- Specs
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide)
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Blaze Dragon with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Blaze Dragon provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Lava Blaze Dragon's 2 years.
Vivo X200 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Blaze Dragon comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Vivo X200 also boasts a brighter screen with 4500 nits of peak brightness, enhancing outdoor visibility. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 18W on Lava Blaze Dragon.
Vivo X200 includes an IP69 rating, while Lava Blaze Dragon lacks an official IP rating.
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.