Lava Bold N1 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1 Pro

Lava Bold N1 Pro
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Motorola Edge 50 Neo

Motorola Edge 50 Neo
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
4310 mAh
68W
-
6.4"
1256 x 2760 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), PDAF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
10 MP
f/2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
13 MP
f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
1080p@30/60/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N77, N78
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N75 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold N1 Pro with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Bold N1 Pro uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Lava Bold N1 Pro has a larger 5000 mAh battery for longer usage. Motorola Edge 50 Neo supports faster wired charging at 68W. Motorola Edge 50 Neo supports wireless charging at 15W, while Lava Bold N1 Pro lacks this feature.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo offers better water and dust resistance with an IP68 rating.