Lava Bold N1 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1
Lava Bold N1
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Samsung Galaxy F36
Samsung Galaxy F36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
9 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Bold N1 with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F36 launched with Android 15 and will receive updates, while Lava Bold N1 has no confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy F36 receives 6 years of security updates, while Lava Bold N1 does not have confirmed info.
Samsung Galaxy F36 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Bold N1 comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F36 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F36 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 10W on Lava Bold N1.
Lava Bold N1 includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F36 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.