Lava Bold N1 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1

Lava Bold N1
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Bold N1 with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo X200 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Bold N1 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo X200 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 has a larger 5800 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo X200 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.