Lava Bold N1 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Bold N1

Lava Bold N1
-
Unisoc SC9863A
28 nm
-
5000 mAh
10W
-
6.75"
720 x 1600 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Vivo X200 Pro

Vivo X200 Pro
-
Dimensity 9400
3 nm
-
6000 mAh
90W
-
6.78"
1260 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
8K@30fps
-
Specs
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
200 MP
f/2.7, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS, 3.7x optical zoom, macro 2.7:1
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
4K@30/60/120fps
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N12, N20, N25, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N66 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo X200 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Bold N1 with the Unisoc Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo X200 Pro has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Bold N1 uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Vivo X200 Pro offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 Pro has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo X200 Pro has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo X200 Pro supports faster wired charging at 90W. Vivo X200 Pro supports wireless charging at 30W, while Lava Bold N1 lacks this feature.
Vivo X200 Pro offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.