Lava Bold alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi A3 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53
4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A53
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
3GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 64GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
(wide), Sony, AF
2 MP
macro
f/2.0, (wide)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Lava Bold with its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) performs better than the Redmi A3 4G with the Mediatek Helio G36 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Redmi A3 4G offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Bold provides 1 years. For security updates, Redmi A3 4G offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Bold's 2 years.
Lava Bold features a superior AMOLED display, while Redmi A3 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Lava Bold offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Lava Bold offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Lava Bold also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 10W on Redmi A3 4G.
Lava Bold includes an IP64 rating, while Redmi A3 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Lava Bold – Check price here
- Redmi A3 4G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.