Lava Bold alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T4x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), Sony, AF
2 MP
macro
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.1, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo T4x with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo T4x offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Bold provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo T4x offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Bold's 2 years.
Lava Bold features a superior AMOLED display, while Vivo T4x comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo T4x features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo T4x also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 33W on Lava Bold.
Both phones feature the same IP64 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Lava Bold – Check price here
- Vivo T4x – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.