Lava Bold alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715
3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), Sony, AF
2 MP
macro
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40 offers 3 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Bold provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo V40 offers 4 years of support compared to Lava Bold's 2 years.
Both Lava Bold and Vivo V40 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V40 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V40 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 33W on Lava Bold.
Vivo V40 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Lava Bold – Check price here
- Vivo V40 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.