Lava Bold alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo X200 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925
3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
16GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), Sony, AF
2 MP
macro
f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p
f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide)
1080p@30/60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo X200 with its Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) performs better than the Lava Bold with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo X200 offers 4 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Bold provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo X200 offers 5 years of support compared to Lava Bold's 2 years.
Both Lava Bold and Vivo X200 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo X200 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo X200 features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo X200 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 33W on Lava Bold.
Vivo X200 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Lava Bold – Check price here
- Vivo X200 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.