Lava Bold alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), Sony, AF
2 MP
macro
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y300 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Bold with the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo Y300 offers 2 years of OS updates, whereas Lava Bold provides 1 years. For security updates, Vivo Y300 offers 3 years of support compared to Lava Bold's 2 years.
Both Lava Bold and Vivo Y300 feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 33W on Lava Bold.
Both phones feature the same IP64 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Lava Bold – Check price here
- Vivo Y300 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.