Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Moto G86 Power alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Moto G86 Power

Moto G86 Power
-
Dimensity 7400
4 nm
-
6720 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1220 x 2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
(wide), AF
f/1.88, 25mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, Sony LYT600, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 12mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.2, (wide), 0.7µm
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Moto G86 Power with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Moto G86 Power features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Moto G86 Power offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Moto G86 Power features a larger 6720 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Moto G86 Power also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Moto G86 Power offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.