Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Moto G96 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Sony LYT-700C, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n26, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Moto G96 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Moto G96 offers 1 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Moto G96 receives 3 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Moto G96 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Moto G96 offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Moto G96 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Moto G96 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Moto G96 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Moto G96 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.