Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Moto G96 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, Sony LYT-700C, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this comparison, the Moto G96 with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Moto G96 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Moto G96 offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Moto G96 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Moto G96 has a larger 5500 mAh battery for longer usage. Moto G96 supports faster wired charging at 33W.
Moto G96 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP68 rating.