Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 50 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Edge 50

Motorola Edge 50
-
Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
68W
-
6.7"
1220x2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710
3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
10 MP
f2.0, 72mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
1080p@30/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Edge 50 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Edge 50 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 50 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 also supports faster wired charging at 68W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G. Motorola Edge 50 supports wireless charging at 15W, while Lava Shark 4G lacks this feature.
Motorola Edge 50 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Motorola Edge 50 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.