Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Edge 50 Neo

Motorola Edge 50 Neo
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
4310 mAh
68W
-
6.4"
1256 x 2760 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.5", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
10 MP
f/2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
13 MP
f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
1080p@30/60/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N66, N75, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 50 Neo offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Lava Shark 4G comes with a larger 5000 mAh battery, which may offer longer usage on a single charge. Motorola Edge 50 Neo also supports faster wired charging at 68W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G. Motorola Edge 50 Neo supports wireless charging at 15W, while Lava Shark 4G lacks this feature.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Motorola Edge 50 Neo – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.