Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 60 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Edge 60

Motorola Edge 60
-
Dimensity 7400
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
68W
-
6.67"
1220 x 2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
(wide), AF
Sony LYT-700C, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
10 MP
f/2.0, 73mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS
50 MP
f/2.0, 12mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.0, (wide), 1.28µm
1080p@30/120fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N2, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Edge 60 with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Edge 60 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 60 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Motorola Edge 60 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Motorola Edge 60 also supports faster wired charging at 68W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Motorola Edge 60 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.