Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion

Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
-
Dimensity 7400
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
68W
-
6.67"
1220 x 2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
11 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Edge 60 Fusion with its MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion offers 3 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Motorola Edge 60 Fusion receives 4 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 60 Fusion offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Motorola Edge 60 Fusion also supports faster wired charging at 68W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Motorola Edge 60 Fusion offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.