Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus

Motorola Edge 60 Stylus
-
Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
68W
-
6.7"
1220 x 2712 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
(wide), AF
f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP
f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: eSIM
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N77, N78
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N48 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Motorola Edge 60 Stylus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Edge 60 Stylus has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 60 Stylus supports faster wired charging at 68W. Motorola Edge 60 Stylus supports wireless charging at 15W, while Lava Shark 4G lacks this feature.
Motorola Edge 60 Stylus offers better water and dust resistance with an IP68 rating.