Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Motorola Moto G85 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Motorola Moto G85

Motorola Moto G85
-
Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080x2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm, AF
f/2.4, (wide), 0.7µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Motorola Moto G85 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Motorola Moto G85 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Motorola Moto G85 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Motorola Moto G85 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G offers better protection against water and dust with an IP54 rating.
- Motorola Moto G85 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.