Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo F27 Pro+ alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Oppo F27 Pro+

Oppo F27 Pro+
-
Dimensity 7050
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
67W
-
6.7"
1080x2412 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
(f/1.7, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF)
2 MP
(f/2.4, (macro))
1080p@30/60/120/480fps
720p@960fps
(f/2.0, (wide))
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo F27 Pro+ with its Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo F27 Pro+ offers 3 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Oppo F27 Pro+ receives 4 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Oppo F27 Pro+ features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Oppo F27 Pro+ offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Oppo F27 Pro+ also supports faster wired charging at 67W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Oppo F27 Pro+ offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.