Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo F31 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
12GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.88", 1.6µm, OmniVision OV50D40, PDAF, OIS
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth), 1/1.5", 1.75µm
720p@60/30fps
f/2.4, (wide), 1/1.3", 1µm, Sony IMX480
720p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo F31 with its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo F31 offers 2 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Oppo F31 receives 3 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Oppo F31 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Oppo F31 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo F31 features a larger 7000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Oppo F31 also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Oppo F31 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Oppo F31 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.