Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Oppo Reno13 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Oppo Reno13 Pro

Oppo Reno13 Pro
-
Dimensity 8350
4 nm
-
5800 mAh
80W
-
6.83"
1272 x 2800 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715
3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), AF
1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Oppo Reno13 Pro with its Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Oppo Reno13 Pro features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Oppo Reno13 Pro offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Oppo Reno13 Pro features a larger 5800 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Oppo Reno13 Pro also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G. Oppo Reno13 Pro supports wireless charging at 50W, while Lava Shark 4G lacks this feature.
Oppo Reno13 Pro offers better protection against water and dust with an IP68 rating.
- Oppo Reno13 Pro – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.