Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco C75 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide)
Auxiliary lens
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n78
In this performance comparison, the Poco C75 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco C75 offers 2 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Poco C75 receives 4 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Lava Shark 4G and Poco C75 use LCD screens. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Poco C75 features a larger 5160 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 18W.
Lava Shark 4G offers better protection against water and dust with an IP54 rating.
- Poco C75 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.