Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco F6 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4
4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720
3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520
12GB 512GB (UFS 4.0)
(wide), AF
(f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS)
8 MP
((ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm)
1080p@30/60/120/240fps
f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N48, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Poco F6 with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco F6 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Poco F6 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Poco F6 also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Poco F6 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Poco F6 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.