Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Poco X7 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.5, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60/120fps
f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 0.7µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
14 5G bands
n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Poco X7 with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Ultra (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Poco X7 launched with Android 14 and will receive updates, while Lava Shark 4G has no confirmed OS update information. Poco X7 receives 4 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed info.
Poco X7 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Poco X7 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Poco X7 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Poco X7 also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Poco X7 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.