Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi 13C alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
In this performance comparison, the Redmi 13C with its Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Lava Shark 4G and Redmi 13C use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 18W.
Lava Shark 4G offers better protection against water and dust with an IP54 rating.
- Redmi 13C – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.