Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi 13C 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Redmi 13C 4G

Redmi 13C 4G
-
Helio G85
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.74"
720x1600 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
4GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, 28mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
0.08 MP
(auxiliary lens)
f/2.0
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
In this performance comparison, the Redmi 13C 4G with its Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Lava Shark 4G and Redmi 13C 4G use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Both devices support the same wired charging speed of 18W.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Redmi 13C 4G lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.