Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Redmi Note 13 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Redmi Note 13

Redmi Note 13
-
Dimensity 6080
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
33W
-
6.67"
1080x2400 pixels
-
108 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
12GB 512GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.4, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N78
In this performance comparison, the Redmi Note 13 with its Mediatek Dimensity 6080 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Redmi Note 13 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Redmi Note 13 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Redmi Note 13 also supports faster wired charging at 33W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Both phones feature the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Redmi Note 13 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.