Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy A16

Samsung Galaxy A16
-
Helio G99
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 256GB (UFS 2.0)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A16 with its Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A16 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A16 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A16 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Both phones feature the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
- Samsung Galaxy A16 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.