Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A25 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy A25

Samsung Galaxy A25
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N66, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A25 with its Exynos 1280 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A25 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A25 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy A25 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.