Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A25 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy A25

Samsung Galaxy A25
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N41 / N66 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A25 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Samsung Galaxy A25 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A25 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 supports faster wired charging at 25W.
Lava Shark 4G has an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A25 lacks official water and dust resistance.