Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy A35

Samsung Galaxy A35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A35 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A35 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A35 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A35 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Samsung Galaxy A35 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
- Samsung Galaxy A35 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.