Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F14 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy F14
Samsung Galaxy F14
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080x2408 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F14 with its Exynos 1330 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F14 offers 2 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy F14 receives 4 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Both Lava Shark 4G and Samsung Galaxy F14 use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F14 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Samsung Galaxy F14 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Samsung Galaxy F14 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F14 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.