Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F16 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy F16

Samsung Galaxy F16
-
Dimensity 6300
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
8GB 128GB
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28, N66
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F16 with its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F16 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F16 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F16 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Both phones feature the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.