Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy F34
Samsung Galaxy F34
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
10 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n28, n38, n40, n41, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F34 with its Exynos 1280 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F34 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy F34 receives 5 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Samsung Galaxy F34 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F34 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Samsung Galaxy F34 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Samsung Galaxy F34 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Samsung Galaxy F34 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP67 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.