Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F54 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy F54

Samsung Galaxy F54
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
108 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F54 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F54 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F54 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Samsung Galaxy F54 features a larger 6000 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Samsung Galaxy F54 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F54 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy F54 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.