Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F56 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy F56

Samsung Galaxy F56
-
Exynos 1480
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
45W
-
6.74"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N41, N78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F56 with its Exynos 1480 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy F56 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F56 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F56 also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy F56 lacks an official IP rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.