Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy M14 4G

Samsung Galaxy M14 4G
-
Snapdragon 680
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30/60fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver
6GB 128GB
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M14 4G with its Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Lava Shark 4G and Samsung Galaxy M14 4G use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy M14 4G offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy M14 4G also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M14 4G lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M14 4G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.