Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M17 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy M17
Samsung Galaxy M17
-
Exynos 1330
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF, OIS, Up to 10x Digital Zoom
5 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro), 1/5.0", 1.75µm
gyro-EIS
f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
13 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n6, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M17 with its Exynos 1330 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy M17 offers 6 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy M17 receives 6 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Samsung Galaxy M17 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Lava Shark 4G offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy M17 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy M17 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Both phones feature the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.