Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M35 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
Samsung Galaxy M35

Samsung Galaxy M35
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.6"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N20, N28, N66
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N77, N78
TDD N38 / N40 / N41 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M35 with the Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Samsung Galaxy M35 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy M35 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Samsung Galaxy M35 has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Samsung Galaxy M35 supports faster wired charging at 25W.
Lava Shark 4G has an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M35 lacks official water and dust resistance.