Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M36 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy M36
Samsung Galaxy M36
-
Exynos 1380
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.7"
1080x2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.96", PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
720p@480fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M36 with its Exynos 1380 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy M36 offers 6 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy M36 receives 6 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Samsung Galaxy M36 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy M36 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy M36 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M36 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M36 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.