Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy M56 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Samsung Galaxy M56
Samsung Galaxy M56
-
Exynos 1480
4 nm
-
5000 mAh
45W
-
6.74"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30/60fps
f/2.2, (wide)
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n41, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy M56 with its Exynos 1480 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy M56 offers 6 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy M56 receives 6 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Samsung Galaxy M56 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy M56 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy M56 also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Lava Shark 4G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy M56 lacks an official IP rating.
- Samsung Galaxy M56 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.