Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Tecno Pova Curve 5G

Tecno Pova Curve 5G
-
Dimensity 7300
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2436 pixels
-
64 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
Sony IMX682, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
(Wide), f/2.2
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N3
TDD: N38
FDD: N3
TDD: N40
In this performance comparison, the Tecno Pova Curve 5G with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Curve 5G offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Tecno Pova Curve 5G offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Tecno Pova Curve 5G also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Tecno Pova Curve 5G offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.