Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Tecno Pova Slim alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G
Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Tecno Pova Slim
Tecno Pova Slim
-
Dimensity 6400
6 nm
-
5160 mAh
45W
-
6.78"
1224 x 2720 pixels
-
50 MP
1440p@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.79, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
In this performance comparison, the Tecno Pova Slim with its Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Tecno Pova Slim offers 1 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed OS update information. Tecno Pova Slim receives 2 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 4G does not have confirmed security update information.
Tecno Pova Slim features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher 144 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Tecno Pova Slim offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Tecno Pova Slim features a larger 5160 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Tecno Pova Slim also supports faster wired charging at 45W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Tecno Pova Slim offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Tecno Pova Slim – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.