Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40 Pro alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Vivo V40 Pro

Vivo V40 Pro
-
Dimensity 9200+
4 nm
-
5500 mAh
80W
-
6.78"
1260x2800 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3
3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510
12GB 512GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP
f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS, 2x optical zoom
50 MP
f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@30fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo V40 Pro with the Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo V40 Pro has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V40 Pro has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo V40 Pro has a larger 5500 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo V40 Pro supports faster wired charging at 80W.
Vivo V40 Pro offers better water and dust resistance with an IP68 rating.