Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V50e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p@60fps
f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
TDD N40 / N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo V50e with the Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo V50e has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V50e has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Vivo V50e has a larger 5600 mAh battery for longer usage. Vivo V50e supports faster wired charging at 90W.
Vivo V50e offers better water and dust resistance with an IP69 rating.