Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V50e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p@60fps
f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
1080p@60fps
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N26, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V50e with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V50e features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G comes with an LCD panel. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V50e offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V50e features a larger 5600 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V50e also supports faster wired charging at 90W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Vivo V50e offers better protection against water and dust with an IP69 rating.
- Vivo V50e – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.