Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y29 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
6GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 128GB (eMMC 5.1)
8GB 256GB (eMMC 5.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
0.08 MP
f/3.0
f/2.0, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo Y29 with its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Lava Shark 4G and Vivo Y29 use LCD screens. Both smartphones offer the same 120 Hz refresh rate. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Both phones have the same screen resolution.
Vivo Y29 features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo Y29 also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 4G.
Vivo Y29 offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Vivo Y29 – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.