Lava Shark 4G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo Y300 Plus alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 4G

Lava Shark 4G
-
Unisoc T606
12 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.67"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
- Specs
Vivo Y300 Plus

Vivo Y300 Plus
-
Snapdragon 695
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
44W
-
6.78"
1080 x 2400 pixels
-
50 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75
6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold
6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
f/2.5, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8
TDD: N77, N78
TDD N77 / N78
In this comparison, the Vivo Y300 Plus with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 4G with the Unisoc Unisoc T606 (12nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Vivo Y300 Plus has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 4G uses an LCD panel. They have the same 120 Hz refresh rate. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo Y300 Plus has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Both phones have the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Vivo Y300 Plus supports faster wired charging at 44W.
Both phones have the same IP54 rating for water and dust resistance.