Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy A25 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G
Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Samsung Galaxy A25
Samsung Galaxy A25
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
5000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
- Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4", 1.12µm
2 MP
f/2.4, (macro)
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
7 5G bands
n1, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
11 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n26, n28, n40, n41, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A25 with its Exynos 1280 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Samsung Galaxy A25 offers 4 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 5G does not have confirmed OS update information. Samsung Galaxy A25 receives 5 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 5G does not have confirmed security update information.
Samsung Galaxy A25 features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy A25 offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Both phones are equipped with the same 5000 mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 also supports faster wired charging at 25W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
Lava Shark 5G includes an IP54 rating, while Samsung Galaxy A25 lacks an official IP rating.
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.