Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Samsung Galaxy F34 alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G

Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
Samsung Galaxy F34

Samsung Galaxy F34
-
Exynos 1280
5 nm
-
6000 mAh
25W
-
6.5"
1080 x 2340 pixels
-
50 MP
4K@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP
f/2.4
1080p@30fps
f/2.2, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano (Hybrid)
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N7, N8, N28
TDD: N38, N40, N41, N78
In this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy F34 with the Exynos 1280 (5nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to its more efficient chipset.
Samsung Galaxy F34 has a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G uses an LCD panel. Moreover, Samsung Galaxy F34 offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate for smoother scrolling. These phones offer the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Samsung Galaxy F34 has a higher resolution display, resulting in sharper visuals.
Samsung Galaxy F34 has a larger 6000 mAh battery for longer usage. Samsung Galaxy F34 supports faster wired charging at 25W.
Samsung Galaxy F34 offers better water and dust resistance with an IP67 rating.