Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo T4x alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G

Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55
8GB 128GB (UFS 3.1)
8GB 256GB (UFS 3.1)
(wide), AF
f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP
f/2.4, (depth)
1080p@30fps
f/2.1, (wide)
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
FDD: N1, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
FDD: N1, N3, N5, N8, N28
TDD: N40, N77, N78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo T4x with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Both Lava Shark 5G and Vivo T4x use LCD screens. In terms of smoothness, Vivo T4x offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo T4x offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo T4x features a larger 6500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo T4x also supports faster wired charging at 44W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
Vivo T4x offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
- Vivo T4x – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.