Lava Shark 5G alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Vivo V40e alternatives
Tap above to see alternatives.
Lava Shark 5G
Lava Shark 5G
-
Unisoc T765
6 nm
-
5000 mAh
18W
-
6.75"
720 x 1612 pixels
-
13 MP
1080p@30fps
-
Specs
2.3 GHz, Dual core, Cortex A76
2.1 GHz, Hexa Core, Cortex A55
8GB 256GB (UFS 2.2)
(wide), AF
f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP
f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide)
1080p
f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
SIM1: Nano, SIM2: Nano
7 5G bands
n1, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
8 5G bands
n1, n3, n5, n8, n28, n40, n77, n78
In this performance comparison, the Vivo V40e with its Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) performs better than the Lava Shark 5G with the Unisoc Unisoc T765 (6nm), thanks to superior chipset efficiency.
Vivo V40e offers 3 years of OS updates, while Lava Shark 5G does not have confirmed OS update information. Vivo V40e receives 4 years of security updates, while Lava Shark 5G does not have confirmed security update information.
Vivo V40e features a superior AMOLED display, while Lava Shark 5G comes with an LCD panel. In terms of smoothness, Vivo V40e offers a higher 120 Hz refresh rate, ensuring fluid scrolling and animations. Both devices deliver the same brightness level at nits. Notably, Vivo V40e offers a higher screen resolution, resulting in sharper visuals and more detailed content.
Vivo V40e features a larger 5500 mAh battery, potentially delivering better battery life. Vivo V40e also supports faster wired charging at 80W, compared to 18W on Lava Shark 5G.
Vivo V40e offers better protection against water and dust with an IP64 rating.
- Lava Shark 5G – Check price here
- Vivo V40e – Check price here
¹ Scores can vary even with the same chipset due to RAM, thermals, and software optimization.